Taylor Vs Manila Electric Company Digest

Plaintiff isaac chavez became a customer of defendant meralco in the year 1953 when he and his family were residing in manila.

Taylor vs manila electric company digest.

Manila electric railroad and light co. The boys for curiosity wandered around the premises and reached the place where the company dumped in the cinders and ashes from its furnaces. The manila electric railroad and light company g r. There they found some 20 30 fulminating caps scattered on the ground.

Manila electric railroad and light company 16 phil 8. Court of appeals 253 scra 303 1996 4. He was also employed as a. August 4 1930 2 pm.

W n the elemnents of quasi delict to make manila electric railroad and light company liable no 2. He was also able to learn some principles of mechanical engineering and mechanical drawing from his dad s office his dad was a mechanical engineer. Manila electric co 57 phil. Federico ylarde et al.

He was also employed as a mechanical draftsman earning p2 50 a day. Trouble developed in a wire used by manila electric company on dimas alang street for the purpose of conducting electricity used in lighting the city of manila and its suburbs jose noguera who had charge of a tienda nearby first noticed that the wire was burning and its connections smoking. My collection of case digests monday july 5 2010. 182976 january 14 2013 manila electric company meralco petitioner vs.

18 civil law torts and damages elements of quasi delict. Castillo respondents d e c i s i o n villarama jr j before us is a petition 1 for review on certiorari seeking to set aside the decision 2 dated may 21 2008. L 4977 16 phil. Julian del rosario vs.

The wire parted and one of the ends of the wire fell to the ground among some. Plaintiff ignacio del prado ran across the street to catch the car. Good father of a family cases. Julian del rosario vs.

In that case the electric company was found negligent in leaving scattered on its premises fulminating caps which taylor a 15 year old boy found and carried home. City of manila v. L 4977 march 22 1910 facts. David taylor was a 15 year old boy who spent time as a cabin boy at sea.

Quasi delict david taylor vs. The motorman eased up but did not put the car into complete stop. Petitioner manila electric company meralco is a public utility corporation providing electric power for the consumption of the general public in metro manila. L 4977 march 22 1910.

Castillo doing business under the trade name and style of permanent light manufacturing enterprises and guia s. Elements of quasi delict torts and damages good father of a family torts and damages. Manila electric railroad and light co 1910 g r. Such was the holding of this court in the case of taylor vs.

Manila electric co 57 phil. Teodorico florenciano meralco s motorman was driving the company s street car along hidalgo street. Torts and damages case digest. He was also able to learn some principles of mechanical engineering and mechanical drawing from his dad s office his dad was a mechanical engineer.

My collection of case digests monday july 5 2010.